Course MapModule menuPrevious documentNext documentSLN HelpDesk
DOCUMENT by: Bob Hassenger
Subject: The Impact of Social Change on the Individual in Society


We began by trying to set a "base line" against which to assess social change. We had to begin somewhere. I thought The Lost Citycaptured very well the 1950's that I remember, growing up Catholic in the Midwest (although not Chicago, until I went to college near there, and to graduate school in the City). Ehrenhalt stated that he did not want the book to be a trip down memory lane, or to romanticize the 1950's. Yet, it was not difficult to detect a note of nostalgia for a time when, although--or, perhaps, because--choices were fewer, people seemed to have more meaningful, if not fuller, lives. In the first assignment, yoiu were asked to consider whether, perhaps paradoxically, fewer choices might result in more "freedom."

In Habits of the Heart, the authors argued that "individualism" had far outstripped "community" as an organizing principle in contemporary American life. They argued for a revivification of "communities of memory" and less emphasis on "lifestyle enclaves." For them, the only really meaningful selves are those grounded in community. And the only way to transcend our solipsistic lives is to become more civically active.

Barber postulated an inherent tension within modern society between globalization and tribalism. For him, not only have the media and the electronic revolution been hugely influential in leading to the present state of affairs, but they offer the best chance that we can transcend the parochialism of Jihad or the materialism of McWorld. He urges a commitment to a new kind of citizenship, not only of a country, but of the world. Barber does not hit so hard on "individualism" as did Bellah et al.,but his appraisal is certainly implicit in his criticisms of McWorld, if not of Jihad; In McWorld, individuals seek to maximize their selves, by consumption; in Jihad, there is an effort to escape from the self, by seeking the collective identity of the group.

None of the authors has suggested that perhaps organizations and community associations founded in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries may not be equipped the meet the different needs of those born after the Second World War. Organizations are typically less slow to change than society. The ways of doing things that have become institutionalized over time tend to persist, even when the functions they once served are no longer necessary. (See Zubov and Maxmin, in the Shared References.) Perhaps those that Belleh et al. and Barber see as those "individualists" seeking their own gratification are less civically involved, using traditional measures.. They may be less likely to join the Elks, Rotary, or the Altar and Rosary Society. But there are non-local "memberships," affinity groups often linked as much by the internet as meeting at the Knights of Columbus hall or the American Legion. Think of Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, or Moveon--which mustered thousands of anti-Iraq War e-mails in 2003, and many thousands more opposing the Bush tax cut. All through the internet, with forwards to friends. These are national, even international, affinity groups. The "individualists" may feel they do not need organizatons to belong to, with weekly, monthly or annual meetings, when they can have on-going virtual meetings and exchanges. This could be a new kind of reformation, of sorts, with parallels to the Protestant Reformation, which denied the necessity of using priests to mediate between individuals and God. A bit of a stretch, perhaps, but the question must be asked about whether the "decline" in civic participation and "citizenship," as traditionally measured, really makes sense for a generation socialized with a whole new set of expectations. In fact, this might be a good question for me to pose for the fourth assignment...

This course may have had more of a political and economic slant than you bargained for. I think that you might have learned more definitions in a traditional course on social change; I'm not persuaded that you would have asked some of the tough questions posed in this course (if not answered). And, I really think that the student who has absorbed the books, checked out additional sources, and entered the discussions has learned more of lasting value than a text-book based course.

You have your own opportunity to evaluate the course--and the instructor/moderator--in the end-of-course questionnaire (below).

If you have any questions about this material, please click on the ASK A QUESTION link below. Now go to the next document to continue this module.


Ask a question

Course MapModule menuPrevious documentNext documentSLN HelpDesk